
Frontenac Mine Trackage
Dan Abbott, Gilpin Railroad Quarterly,
January 2003
The Gilpin Tramway reached the
Frontenac Mine before the end of July in 1888. An ore chute was erected
before the end of August in that same year to transport ore taken from this
mine over the Gilpin Tramway to the Black Hawk Sampling Works. This remained
the end of track for the Gilpin Tramway prior to the end of 1905 when the
Banta Hill Extension was constructed.
The Frontenac and Aduddell Mines were
located at the head of South Willis Gulch and were developed along the same
vein under the same management. In ore development the Frontenac’s east
shaft was used for hoisting while the Aduddell’s west shaft was used for
ventilation for both of these mines. The Frontenac shaft followed the dip of
the lode and connected with eight levels and one sub-level. The fourth level
of the Frontenac workings connected with the fifth level of the Adudell’s
west shaft, which were at the same elevation. The seventh level of the
Frontenac connected through a rise with the fourth level of the main
Aduddell shaft.
According to H. P. Lowe, who was
manager of the Frontenac-Aduddell properties, the total gross production of
both the Frontenac and Aduddell mines up to the fall of 1911 was estimated
at $2,250,000.
On December 20,1905, Foreman C. H.
Mathais received four cars of 40-pound steel rail (old), which amounted to
about 12,000 track feet and 350 pairs of 40-pound angle bars (also old).
Just three days later
—
on
December 23, 1905— this same foreman had received 6 track shovels, 4 mauls,
4 wrenches, 1 ratchet, 6 picks, 12 pick handles, 2 track gauges, 2 level
boards, 9 drill bits, 1 tape line and 8,000 ties for some new work on the
Banta Hill Extension in the vicinity of the Frontenac Mine.
The Frontenac Mine was located at M.P.
44.35 while the end of the spur for this mine was at MR 44.45 or 528 feet in
length. However, one map indicated that there was a short passing track
located on this spur. Side trackage located at the Frontenac Mine on
July
1, 1910 amounted to 3,892 feet.F
However, as early as
September 2, 1909, a spur track to the Frontenac Mine shaft had been
completed under A.F.E.#372 which amounted to 3,643 feet. The C. & S.
Auditor went so far as to compare the estimate with the actual expense of
constructing this spur for the Frontenac Mining Company.
Construction of new trackage along with
the extension of a storage track occurred at the Frontenac Mine between
October 1909 and February 1910. This east storage track was extended 550
feet, while a new siding 600 feet long and a new spur 400 foot long were
also constructed to provide convenient facilities for the handling of cars
to and from the Frontenac Mine at a cost of $1,862.50.
October 1909
$
597.00
November 1909
$
430.00
January 1910
$
208.00
February 1910
$
97.19
Subtotal
$1,332.19
Less credit
-$17.36
Total
$1,314.83
Construction of other new improvements
was begun on November 8 and completed just seven days later on
November 15, 1910. Apparently some of the Pease-Kansas Branch was removed in
order to obtain track material for the new improvements at the Frontenac
Mine as the following indicates:
November 1, 1910- Personal expenses of engineering
party during the month of October 1910, while engaged on surveys for track
to Frontenac Mine (A.F.E.#863).
W. Whitmore $2.50
H.E.Pearce $2.50
P.L.Wigton $2.50
Total $7.50
November11, 1910 -
We would like to take up as much of the
Pease-Kansas spur at MR 41.41 on Gilpin Railroad as is necessary to complete
tracks at the Frontenac Mine.
November 15, 1910 -This will be your authority for taking
up the abandoned spur to the Pease-Kansas Mine on the Gilpin Railroad, and
to relay the rail taken from this spur at the Frontenac Mine.
November 21, 1910 - Taking up 1,256
feet of the end of Pease-Kansas spur from Gilpin Railroad on Quartz Hill at
estimated cost of $38.35 to provide rail for use on other tracks.
November 21, 1910 - Concerning rail
taken up on the Pease-Kansas spur to complete work at Erontenac Mine
—
1,125.5 feet of track taken up between
November 12th through November 16th, 1910.
November 1910 - Material used at
Frontenac Mine
—
1,825
feet 40-pound steel rail, three switch stands $558.78
December 7, 1910 -General Manager Pircher of the Gilpin
Railroad advised that the following expenses on the Gilpin Railroad during
the month of November should be charged to the Frontenac Mine tracks:
Engineer 96 firs. @ .35c
=
$33.60
Fireman 96 hrs. @2 25c
=
$24.00
Conductor 96 hrs. @.30c
=
$28.80
Total
$86.40
9tons of coal used and 9,000 gallons of
water used at 50 cents per thousand.
According to A.F.E. #863 which was
dated
September 27, 1910, a contract was being prepared which provided for the
deposit of a check to cover the total estimated cost of this work with the
railroad company by H. P Lowe of the mining company.
This total amount was to be refunded to
the mining company at the rate of fifty cents per car on all carload
shipments handled into or out of the Frontenac or Aduddell Mines, which were
to pay the Gilpin Railroad Company $4.50 or more per car, within a period of
two years, from date of completion of the track work.
When the total of this refund had
reached $1,862.50 or at the expiration of the two years the tracks were to
become the sole property of the Gilpin Railroad Company whether such refunds
had reached the total amount or not.
H.P.Lowe of the Frontenac Mining
Company was to furnish to the railroad company title to the right of way for
the trackage free of cost to the railroad company. However, by
June
2, 1911 this contract was still pending for this right of way for trackage
to the Frontenac Mine which was constructed on September 30, 1910.
Even as late as
May
5, 1911, the C. & S. Auditor was concerned with a refund to the Frontenac
Consolidated Mines Company, as it was then known, as the following letter
states:
“We have had up with the engineering
department for some time the question of easement for the land on which the
Gilpin Railroad tracks were built for the Frontenac Mining Company but the
engineering department has been unable to make up a satisfactory description
to embody in the easement covering these tracks. H. P Lowe has been ready to
give us easement on his own ground and to obtain easements from other
parties on ground not owned by him but we have been unable to have the
easements prepared owing to the complex situation relating to various mining
claims. I believe the engineering department want to abandon the idea of
obtaining easements for these tracks particularly in view of the fact that
so many Gilpin Railroad spur tracks have been built without easements or any
agreement covering right-of-way.
By
January 1, 1912, as well as July 1, 1913, the tail of track at the Frontenac
Mine was listed at 0.16 mile, or 844.8 feet.


Aduddell Mine with Frontenac in background.
Mining Investor Aug 8, 1908
Note the below photos were not specifically identified as
these mines. However, it was the only location I could match the
photo's too. I preliminarily identified the photo's from looking
at the location in my Trainz model. The kicker that convinced me
I had identified them correctly is that three pictures down in the series
shows an office with a sign at the entry saying "Topeka, Frontenac and
Aduddell Mines". Based on other pictures of the series, these
pictures were probably taken in fall of 1910.